Seeking Sanctuary: The Historic Climate Refuge between Australia and Tuvalu
As the effects of climate change intensify, global responses such as the Australia-Tuvalu refuge treaty prove crucial in alleviating challenges for vulnerable nations.
In response to the imminent and devastating effects of climate change, Australia has offered refuge to the citizens of Tuvalu, one of the world’s smallest and most remote countries.
Situated between Hawaii and Australia, Tuvalu, with a population of merely 11,200 people, is experiencing rising sea levels that threaten to submerge the nine remaining islands of the once eleven.
The Australia-Tuvalu Falepili Union treaty unveiled during the Pacific Islands Forum on November 10, 2023 acknowledges that climate change is Tuvalu’s greatest national security concern. By 2050, a significant portion of Tuvalu’s landmass and vital infrastructure will likely be submerged below the average high tide if climate change proceeds as projected. Scientists predict Tuvalu could become completely uninhabitable in the next 50 to 100 years. The United Nations Development Programme classifies Tuvalu as a resource poor country that is extremely vulnerable to the effects of climate change.
Despite this, Tuvalu’s official government policy is to stay on the islands, evacuating is a last resort. With no concrete plan as to where the Tuvaluan people would go, they feel they will remain on their islands “come what may.” Tuvaluan past prime minister Enele Sopoaga says, “Moving outside of Tuvalu will not solve any climate change issues…If you put these people in the middle of industrialized countries it will simply boost their consumptions and increase greenhouse gas emissions.”
Tuvalu’s challenge is seen worldwide as one stemming from human activities, particularly by the burning of fossil fuels that emit carbon dioxide, amplifying global warming. Climate change has set off a cascade of multifaceted consequences in Tuvalu, challenging the sustainability of livelihoods for its inhabitants. Due to ocean water contamination, Tuvalu has become heavily dependent on rainwater. The increasing frequency at which droughts are occurring has rendered the soil practically unsuitable for agriculture. Pacific Island crops and staples such as taro and cassava can only be imported at a great expense. Additionally, the direct impacts are evident in the surge of health issues faced by the local population. Around ten Tuvaluans come down with ciguatera poisoning every week, a sickness contracted from eating reef fish that have ingested algae from bleached coral, cases that have noticeably increased on par with the changing climate.
The historic treaty commits to granting visas to a maximum of 280 individuals per year, allowing them to work, study, and live in Australia. Unmentioned here is the reality that it would take approximately 40 years for Tuvalu’s entire population to relocate to Australia under these visa provisions. Tuvalu’s Prime Minister Kausea Natano mentioned that the limit was enforced to prevent brain drain. This phenomenon refers to skilled citizens leaving their home nation in pursuit of attractive opportunities in other more prosperous destinations.
Tuvalu is primarily allocating its resources to safeguarding its physical lands with talk of constructing costly sea walls, elevating low-lying islands, and strongly advocating for global climate action. Yet, it lacks the financial means to fund these ambitious projects alone, leaving the nation ill-equipped for the probable scenario in which its adaptation efforts prove inadequate. Tuvalu is heavily reliant on foreign aid, with most of its GDP coming from donations from the UN and neighboring countries. Education and employment opportunities are limited, and the majority of youth leave to study in neighboring islands like Fiji, Australia, or New Zealand.
Australia’s commitment extends to collaboration with Tuvalu to enhance the country’s resilience against the impacts of climate change. Including practical measures and efforts to amplify and advocate for Tuvalu’s concerns and needs on a global platform. Australia is pledging collaboration to the Tuvalu coastal adaptation project which aims to reclaim land by expanding landmass to create more space for essential services and housing. Notably, however, the treaty lacks any mention of action regarding the reduction or regulation of the Australian coal and gas developments. These industries contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating the pace of climate change. As the second most coal-dependent country in the world, Australia’s continued reliance on and expansion of the coal and gas industry contradict the spirit of collaborative climate action and also pose a challenge in mitigating the causes of the environmental crisis faced by nations like Tuvalu.
As the treaty unfolds, a crucial question emerges: Will the partnership between Tuvalu and Australia be comprehensive enough to address the broader concerns of climate change? The treaty’s focus on adaptation is commendable, but the root of concern shared by all Pacific Island nations remains unaddressed. The effectiveness and long-term impact of this treaty hinges not only on adaptation efforts but also the reduction of activities contributing to the climate crisis.